Login


Wolfe Publishing Group
    Menu

    Bullets & Brass

    Colt Offical Police .38-44 Loads

    The Colt Official Police, built on the I-frame, is suitable for .38-44 loads when velocities do not exceed those of vintage factory loads.
    The Colt Official Police, built on the I-frame, is suitable for .38-44 loads when velocities do not exceed those of vintage factory loads.
    Q: Back in October 2006, you wrote an article on the .38-44 cartridge. The question is: would a post-World War II Colt Official Police in .38 Special be able to handle the .38-44 loads? Also, would the Smith & Wesson Model 10 Heavy Duty .38 Special handle the same loads? Smith & Wesson used this same gun to create the Model 13 .357 Magnum by reaming out the chambers to .357 Magnum, so it seems logical that it should easily handle heavy .38-44 loads. Thanks for your help. – D.L., via e-mail

    A: Colt did indeed recommend the original Official Police (pre-World War II version, produced from 1927 to 1946) as well as the postwar version (1947 to 1969) for use with .38-44 factory loads.

    Regarding the post-World War II Smith & Wesson Model 10; I would not recommend that revolver (and neither does Smith & Wesson) for use with .38-44 loads. It is fine for use with +P data that is established at 20,000 psi, but those loads are generating less pressure than original .38-44 loads.

    For the record, Smith & Wesson conducted a considerable amount of testing with different steels and heat-treating methods to get the Model 13 and Model 19, with its adjustable sights, to accept the .357 Magnum cartridge. In other words, the frames used on K-frame .357 Magnum revolvers are indeed different than those used on most K-frame .38 Special revolvers. As a side note, Smith & Wesson limited .38-44 ammunition performance and pressures so that when these comparatively warm loads found their way into the chambers of a K-frame revolver, they would not destroy it. Again, I do not recommend (and neither does Smith & Wesson) the use of .38-44 loads in K-frame .38 Special revolvers.

    Incidentally, Colt eventually developed I-frame revolvers, such as the Python, Colt .357 and Trooper, to accept the .357 Magnum, which is the same basic frame as used on your Official Police. However, they too had small engineering changes, along with increased tensile steel strength. The point is that you should never use data that develops similar pressures as the .357 Magnum in your Official Police.

    Regarding .38-44 handloading data, much available data (including mine) often exceeds the pressures and velocities of original factory loads, for which there were no industry-standardized pressures. Such loads are intended specifically for Smith & Wesson N-frame and Colt Single Action Army revolvers, or guns of similar strength. I would suggest that any data you use in your Colt Official Police should not exceed 1,100 fps when using a 158-grain bullet, which will develop similar pressures as vintage .38-44 factory loads.

    Incidentally, in Handloader No. 304 (Oct/Nov 2016), I updated .38 Special +P loads and offered additional data for the .38-44 in a “Pet Loads” feature, which might be helpful to you.


    .218 Bee Components

    Hornady now offers .218 Bee component brass. Alliant 2400 powder will duplicate factory load performance and accuracy.
    Hornady now offers .218 Bee component brass. Alliant 2400 powder will duplicate factory load performance and accuracy.
    Q: I have been unable to find any .218 Bee ammunition or brass to handload for more than four years. Having two rifles so chambered, including a Winchester Model 65 and a Marlin Model 1894CL, I was thrilled to learn that Hornady is offering ammunition and brass as a component.

    I finally located and purchased new Hornady cases and am now ready to begin loading. I still have a quantity of the Speer 45-grain flatnose bullets on hand. In years past, before my old brass became tired and began splitting, I used Alliant Reloder 7 powder. My supply is mostly used up now, which takes me to the question that I have for you: What powder and charge weight would you suggest that will duplicate factory loads and is likely to be the most accurate? Thanks in advance for your insight. – T.S., via e-mail

    A: A single, most accurate powder and charge weight is often requested but is extremely difficult to provide, as there are so many variables that can change the results. With that thought in mind, I suggest trying between 11.0 and 11.2 grains of Alliant 2400 powder, which should produce velocities between 2,790 and 2,815 fps. I also recommend crimping cases with a Lee Factory Crimp Die, so the crimp can be applied gently to this rather thin case without damage but still results in enough bullet pull to aid powder ignition while also preventing bullets from becoming deeply seated when pushed into the tubular magazine of leverguns. The industry generally uses small rifle primers with this cartridge, but a handloader can usually lower extreme spreads, and therefore improve accuracy, by using a small pistol standard primer such as the Federal No. 100 or CCI 500, both of which are designed to handle up to 40,000 CUP pressure, which is the industry maximum average for this cartridge.


    Magnum Primers for the .357

    Alliant 2400 powder produces lower pressures and better accuracy when ignited with standard primers.
    Alliant 2400 powder produces lower pressures and better accuracy when ignited with standard primers.
    Q: I have a question regarding the use of magnum primers with Alliant 2400 powder. I think that in past issues of Handloader you have indicated to not use magnum primers with that powder. I have been reloading my .357 Magnum with 2400 and CCI 550 Magnum primers since 1973. My load consists of approximately 160-grain bullets from Lyman mould No. 358156 with 14.5 grains of 2400 powder with the above mentioned CCI 550 primers. Recently I started loading Oregon Trail 190-grain cast bullets using 12.0 grains of 2400 powder with the same primer. It works really well on silhouettes out to 200 yards. I might be mistaken, but I would like to hear your reasoning. Thanks for the great magazine. – J.K., via e-mail

    A: When Hercules 2400 (now Alliant) was first introduced in 1932, it was almost immediately put to use for heavy handloads in sixgun cartridges, including .38 Special, .44 Special, .45 Colt and others, and by 1935 it was used in factory-loaded .357 Magnum ammunition. At the time there were no magnum revolver primers. Magnum primers for revolver cartridges first appeared with the introduction of sometimes hard-to-ignite spherical powders that were first used by factories in their offerings for magnum revolver cartridges and later offered as a component to handloaders. This is when the problems began.

    The average handloader often surmises that if he is shooting a magnum revolver, he needs “magnum” primers regardless of the powder or load selected. I am aware of several laboratories that have conducted specific tests with 2400 powder, comparing magnum and standard primers: H.P. White Laboratory, Hercules, Speer, Alliant and others including me. The results have varied slightly, but each concluded that 2400 produced notably larger extreme spreads and greater pressures when ignited with magnum primers. Some reports establish that there was between a 20 and 22 percent pressure increase when changing from standard to magnum primers, which even varies depending on primer manufacturer and lot number. In other words, a sixgun load that has been pressure tested using standard primers, and is within industry pressure guidelines, can actually exceed pressure limits by substituting a magnum primer, and the shooter will probably never know it.

    More evidence of this can be seen in the Speer Reloading Manual Nos. 12 and 13. When these manuals appeared, I noticed that 2400 powder loads for the .357 and .44 Magnums were ignited with magnum primers, and their performance levels fell behind other powders due to pressure limits. I contacted my old friend Alan Jones, the Speer Manual’s editor, and pointed out that Hercules and later Alliant never recommended the use of magnum primers with this powder and suggested that Speer reshoot the data with standard primers. Accuracy improved, and 2400 became a top-performing powder in both cartridges. That data was published in Speer Reloading Manual No. 14 with the notation: “Do not use magnum primers with the 2400 and Vihtavuori N110 loads shown here or high pressures will result.”

    Oregon Trail Bullets (www.laser-cast.com) lists a 180-grain FP, rather than the 190 grain you mention. I would encourage you to try your loads with standard primers, which is certain to lower extreme spreads and pressure, and will probably improve accuracy.


    Long-Range .308 Loads

    Hodgdon Varget is a top choice for assembling handloads in the .308 Winchester with Hornady 178-grain ELD-X bullets.
    Hodgdon Varget is a top choice for assembling handloads in the .308 Winchester with Hornady 178-grain ELD-X bullets.
    Q: I am trying to assemble a super accurate long range .308 Winchester load for my Howa Model 1500 Varmint. I have acquired a quantity of Hornady 178-grain ELD-X bullets and will be using Hodgdon Varget powder. Can you suggest a charge weight? Thanks in advance. – J.C., via e-mail

    A: I suggest beginning with 40.0 grains and working up 1.0 grain at a time to around 43.0 to 43.5 grains, this charge probably being maximum. I would be checking each load increment for pressure, accuracy and record extreme spreads, as it is possible that your rifle’s accuracy “sweet” spot might be below maximum powder charges.


    Wolfe Publishing Group